Consent is essential when making biopics – The Suffolk Journal


blond. Ana de Armas as Marilyn Monroe.

Biopics are a popular form of media today, but with this popularity often comes a backlash from people involved in these shows, who were not consulted. When biopics are made, they often do not take into account or include the opinions of the people affected.

When made without consent, biopics can have a number of negative effects: they can damage reputations, ignore the wishes of the person on whom the biopic is based, create unfair opinions or prejudices and This may exploit the conflicts of those involved, even posthumously.

An example of this is Pamela Anderson, who created the Hulu series “Pam & Tommy” about herself and her ex-husband, Tommy Lee. She wrote a memoir and made a documentary about her life, but was angry at not being consulted on a show made about her. According to Harper’s Bazaar Despite an attempt to “rehabilitate her image”, “all he did was re-exploit her.”

She initially refused to consent to making the show, but it was done against her wishes, as the biopic’s subject matter included painful points in her life, including a sex tape that brought Lee notoriety. Was. On the contrary, she experienced career-hampering misogyny.

“Pam & Tommy” is no exception when it comes to biopics and sexism – biopics often display misogyny. Men are usually supportive of them, while women are usually more critical. Lee praised the film because the situation benefited his career, while Anderson Emphasized that she was a survivor Of his situation.

The Netflix biopic “Blonde” is based on a book based on the life of Marilyn Monroe. It turns Monroe into a symbol, strips her of being a real person and turns her into a symbol. Hollywood representation to some extentWhich was basically what was done to her when she was in the Hollywood area.

film also exploits monroe’s strugglesAccording to Dexterto, “making an NC-17 spectacle of Monroe’s travails from sexual assault to pregnancy to drug addiction”. The tragedies and sufferings of celebrities are given great importance, and exploiting them for entertainment is exploitative and unethical, especially after a celebrity’s death.

Similarly, “Back to Black”, a biopic about Amy Winehouse has already received a response despite not being released yet. His addiction and mental health were heavily publicized, and many found that making a biopic about his struggles after his death was exploitative.

However, when biopics involve the people on whom they are based, they are done in a way that is more ethical and does not negatively impact the subject’s life or career. This way, certain topics can be addressed in a way that appeals to all parties.

An example of this is “Molly’s Game”, a biopic based on Molly Bloom, who ran a poker ring that attracted the upper echelons of society, including Mafia members and celebrities.

Bloom was a supporter of the film because she was Suggest it and tell the director, He also approved of Jessica Chastain’s performance as her. This type of biopic is the only way it should be done with the full support and cooperation of the subject.

Biopics are harmful when they exploit the struggles of a person who lived a highly publicized life. These should be made only with the cooperation and consent of those who may be affected or have been affected by the subject matter.

Source link

Leave a Comment