Genocide International Court forces Israel to take all measures to stop genocide – El Salto

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has today, Friday 26 January, issued its opinion on precautionary measures on the complaint of genocide promulgated by South Africa against Israel in a case relating to the application of the Convention on Prevention and Punishment. Crime. The crime of genocide in the Gaza Strip.

The South African legal team hoped that the ICJ would send a message demanding a ceasefire and place Israel in a settlement position as a result of war crimes continuing since the previous 7 October. Thus, this decision is a continued defeat for Israel and its main defenders, the United States and Germany. Although the message is clear, doubts remain about its application and whether Israel will accept the provisional measures or even violate the International Court of Justice. The orders of this High Court are binding and Israel has immersed itself in a case that will evaluate whether it has broken the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (1948), which involves both the Zionist State and the plaintiff, South Africa . Member.

ICJ President Judge Donoghue reminded that any State Party may point out the responsibilities of other State Parties to respect the provisions of the Genocide Convention. With that first statement, it was clear that there would be no “technical” problems in taking the case, leaving the State of Israel to face a lengthy process for genocide.

Judge Donoghue: South Africa has submitted a report into Israel’s violations of the Convention for the Prevention of Genocide in Gaza. South Africa has the right to bring the case and Israel’s request to dismiss it cannot be accepted.

Judge Donoghue: The Israeli campaign resulted in approximately 25,000 deaths, approximately 60,000 injuries and the displacement of large numbers of civilians.

The International Criminal Court in The Hague says South Africa has shown sufficient evidence that the case against Israel is legitimate, that genocide is possibly being committed, and provisional measures will be taken: “Israel’s actions in Gaza may constitute genocide, given the intent To completely or partially destroy a particular ethnic group, the Palestinians.”

The ICJ has taken into account the comments of Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Galant when he said: “We are human beings fighting animals and we will act in the same manner.” Donoghue also reported that Netanyahu has assured that Israel’s war will continue for several months. The Court believes that there is a serious risk that conditions for citizens will worsen before a final judgment is issued in this case.

The Court considers that civilians in the Gaza Strip face a very difficult situation: the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip is at great risk and may become more tragic before the Court takes a decision” (in relation to the case) The International Court of Justice rules in favor of South Africa’s request for provisional measures against Israel over the Gaza war.

Donoghue’s reading of Israel’s obligations was taken by a majority of the judges (15 to two and 16 to one in different recommendations). By a vote of 15 in favor and 2 against, the court ordered Israel to take all measures within its power to cease all actions in Gaza that violate the Convention on Genocide. 16-1: Court rules that Israel must cease and punish inflammatory statements.

13:28

Follow him to El Salto

Follow it live here:

13:20

South Africa has the right to sue

Judge Donoghue reminded that any State Party may point out the responsibilities of other States Parties to respect the provisions of the Genocide Convention.

Judge Donoghue: South Africa has submitted a report into Israel’s violations of the Convention for the Prevention of Genocide in Gaza. South Africa has the right to bring the case and Israel’s request to dismiss it cannot be accepted.

13:20

John Donoghue read the court’s deliberations

The session began with the reading of the charges by John Donoghue, the current President of the International Court of Justice. It reminded that the Court may take provisional measures if the circumstances comply with Articles 7 and 9 of the Convention against Genocide, to which Israel is a signatory.

This is the first moment of victory for South Africa’s thesis, as Donoghue assumes that Hague has the legitimacy to enter into the case.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button