Government secures 28 signatures in Senate and formalises Aadhaar law opinion

The National Government can now celebrate its first victory in the Senate. It hasn’t been discovered yet The final version of the Opinion on Aadhaar law and fiscal package, However the necessary signatures to take it to the venue were secured last night and by this afternoon the 28 signatures needed from the three commissions for a majority opinion had already been obtained.

It is not the only thing worth paying attention to when the document is known who signed but how did they do it. An example of this is the incident with the PRO Senator Guadalupe Tagliaferriwho announced this in the commission will be with the opinion But will support the ruling party Dissidents. He same currency The radical senator took pablo blanco.but it still remains Know what will be the position of other senators The ruling party gave assurances last night that they would accompany them; among them are José María Carambia, Edgardo Cuider, Carlos Espínola, Edith Terenzi and Alejandra Vigo.

Both opinions were completed this morning and according to the LLA, they already have all the signatures. On this list are Senator CArlos Espinola; Luis Jud; Juan Carlos Romero, Eduardo Visci, Ezequiel Attauche; Bartolomé Abdalá, Guadalupe Tagliaferri -for two because he is on two commissions-; Pablo Blanco Blanco; Victor Zimmerman Flavio Fama -also for two-; Mónica Silva -for two-; Edgardo Cuider -for two-; Marcela Cristina; Alejandra Vigo; Lucila Crexell -for two-; Rodolfo Suárez; Mariana Jury; Carmen Álvarez Rivero; José María Carambia; Carlos Arce; Juan Carlos Pagotto and Sonia Rojas Decat.

This also means that you will have Final text of both projects of the law, which will be debated in the nation’s Senate next week.

To this is added the fact that the opinion of Union for the Motherland and the radical senator Martin Loustau,

In fact, this situation generated a counter-argument between the Casa Rosada and the President of the Deputies –Martin Menem- accompanied by his Senate counterpart, Victoria Villarruel, before and during the advance ceremonies of the Legislative Technique Reality Who could not guarantee that victory.

“Yes, the opinion of the full commissions was signed and it will be discussed in the Senate. You need to set a dateBut opinions are accepted. I don’t want to confirm a date because that’s a Senate decision, but my guess is it will be between this week and next week., We are very satisfied” the new chief of staff Guillermo Francos said last night.

The text of the opinion will be fundamental to understand how the negotiations ended at the last minute yesterday. It is known that the Santa Cruz senator Jose Maria Carambia -which began with the announcement of his own opinion- ended with negotiations with Franco on an increase from 3% to 5% in mining royalties for provinces that joined the large investment tax regime (RIGI).

Another point that requires knowing the text of the opinion, and several senators have made it known, is the situation of Aerolíneas Argentinas and Correo Argentino. Patagonian legislators oppose its privatization, the government has been inflexible so far, and dissident Peronist Juan Carlos Romero has proposed moving forward with a mixed system.

Along the same lines, it is unknown how the article referring to the Social Monotribute was written. It was abolished in the Chamber of Deputies, but reinstated in the Senate. The ruling party, which accepted it, wanted to put the executive in charge of regulating it, but the opposition opposed. This is another issue on which some of the senators who signed it have disagreed.

A key point for the Patagonians of the Dialogue Opposition: in profits, the non-taxable minimum will be increased by 22%. However, for others it represents an inequality before the law in the national tax and can cause inconveniences. Once again, the way the article is expressed will define whether it has the support of a large part of the legislators.

Now, when the text is known, another game of additions and subtractions will begin. Freedom Advance will have to make sure that the changes that are approved (but that it does not want) are not achieved by more than half plus one. If this happens, you have a chance to insist on the original article in the deputies with the same number of votes: half plus one. The problem will be if some changes are approved by two-thirds, because the same number will have to be obtained in the lower house to be able to support the original text.