he did the same thing to them in the first part | Relief

The controversial final at the Mestalla between Valencia and Real Madrid continues to cause controversy in every corner of the country. Gil Manzano’s mismanagement of the latest campaign had all sorts of consequences, from arguments in the locker room tunnel that ended Vinicius is held by his teammates as Ceballos looks safely aheadeven reactions similar to reactions Hugo Duro who, as always sincerely, admitted that “Gil Manzano should have whistled earlier, as he told us, but without doing so, I understand that Madrid is complaining that he did not leave the play until the end.”

It was Hugo Duro, like all Valencia players, They weren’t surprised it’s Gil Manzano’s last-minute management. Just because In the first part he did the same thing. The minute was ticking 50:55 Manzano added in the first half 5 plus 1 extra minute after Vinicius’ goal and Valencia were desperate to hit back before the break. Judge gave one more action and, as in the second part, this concession was taken literally.

Gaya crossed, Tchuameni knocked the ball out as best he could, the ball fell on Carvajal, who, due to poor control, left the ball dead in the penalty area, and just as Sergi Canos returned the ball in the Lunin area in a very advantageous position… Gil Manzano whistled at the end of the first half. Sergi came out to protest like crazy, Mestalla went crazy because the restoration was extremely dangerous in favor of Valencia. Even Baraja jumped onto the field to talk to the referee! But he was specific: he gave only one game and believed that as soon as Madrid won, even if they did. leave the ball dead in your own zone and Che returned it, the game was over.

So, in the second half, when Mamardashvili knocks the ball out and the ball gets to the Real Madrid players, in the battle traceable to what is explained in the first part, Gil Manzano realized the same thing he did 45 minutes ago and blew the final whistle. However, this does not explain the delay in the referee’s whistle as such, which is a serious error and logically subject to criticism, but yes, the assessment of the play itself: No matter how much Valencia’s run fell in Madrid’s favor, Manzano He understood that it passed from one play to another. and so I had to blow the final whistle.

In fact, this was one of the moves of discord. Because when there was a row in the locker room tunnelone of those who was in front was Sergi Canos and he kept telling the white players that In the first part they did the same thing to him and the one that was set up at the end of the game was never set up. The truth is that the game was as controversial as it was unsurprising for the Valencia players, who had already experienced what Madrid later experienced.