Intel Core Ultra 9 285K reaches +21% FPS when overclocked

The Intel Core Ultra 200S are here, and although we had high hopes for them, they ended up disappointing us. They offer performance well below expectations, not so much in programs but in video games. Here they perform worse than the company’s other older processors, and that makes no sense. That’s why we continue to look at various analyzes and reviews to understand what is happening and what solutions exist. Let’s look at Derauer again because he discovered that
You can significantly improve the gaming performance of the Core Ultra 9 285K by overclocking Ring.,
D2D and NSU.

Currently, Intel is the most popular processor company in the world. market share of more than 70% in the sector of processors for PCs and laptops. While it must be admitted that AMD has made significant progress in the years since the launch of the first Ryzen processors, it continues fall far behind the blue team. All this is quite difficult to believe, since Intel is on a streak of releasing processors that do not stand out too much and have already crowned themselves as a bad product with their latest ones.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K can improve its gaming performance by overclocking Ring, D2D and NGU.

Returning to der8auer’s analysis, we skip the DLVR part that we already discussed in another news story and move on to the last section of the video, which discusses the changes made to improve the performance of the Core Ultra 200S. This is where it is referred to as Core Ultra 9 285K in games like Counter-Strike 2 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage. It sits above the Ryzen 9 9950X.but below Intel Core 14, which it should surpass or at least reach to a certain extent.

To achieve this, you will have to do what you do best – experiment, conduct dispersethereby increasing the frequency Ring,
D2D (Die to Die) and NGU (next generation Uncore),
Fine Increasing the processor frequency in the traditional way almost does not increase performancewhich TechPowerUp already mentioned in its review. That particular review mentioned these terms, but did not compare performance and what would happen if you raised the frequencies.

Now that der8auer has tested it, we can say that the results are very positive in games like Counter-Strike 2 at 1440p. Frequency increase Ring at 4.2 GHz we win 50 average FPS consuming
10 W more. Approaching 3.8 GHz D2D and 3.6 GHz NGUwe get 23 frames per second more With
6 W additional. The biggest improvement is seen when overclocking the Core Ultra 9 285K processor to 5.7 GHz and 5.1 GHz for D2D watches, where you can get almost
80 fps more media and increased consumption
23 W additional.

Games like Counter-Strike 2 at 1440p achieve an additional 150 FPS, and in Mirage we achieve just over 10%

At the same time, we have growth 150 average FPS and height approximately 40 Wwhich is not bad at all with such an overclocking of the Core Ultra 9 285K. Of course, not everything is so good, because if we look at
SPF minimumsthey left
from 283 to 332but they are still far behind 409 i9-14900KS. We now move on to Assassin’s Creed Mirage at 1080p with maximum graphics, where we see the Ryzen 9 9950X running much lower with an average of 138 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D averages 161 FPS.

Above we have Ultra 9 285K dElectronic factory that reaches 166 average FPS and 104 minimum FPS
consuming 98.8 W. When Ring is overclocked to 4.2 GHz, it increases to 170 average FPS and 109 minimum FPSincreasing consumption to 114 W. If we add to this the OC at 3.8 GHz for D2D, we get 2W more and an increase of 2 in average and minimum FPS. By adding a 3.6 GHz NGU, we still have a couple of FPS left, and by overclocking to 5.7 GHz/5.1 GHz DD, we reach 9 more FPS and 10 additional Watts.