Ed Sheeran, Daddy Yankee or Lana Del Rey may be the headliners of a festival, but they have been the protagonists of the latest court cases involving plagiarism, wills and copyrights.
Not everything in the music field is entertainment. This industry has to deal with very serious legal disputes, whether it is due to potential plagiarism, copyright-related issues or poor distribution of profits. multitude of issues Cases related to artists have reached the court.
Ed Sheeran’s case regarding alleged plagiarism has been the most famous, although singers such as Lana Del Rey and Nicki Minaj have also been affected.
However, one of the most significant settlements, involving Prince and Andy Warhol, has been taken by the US Supreme Court, which determined that the latter infringed a photographer’s copyright when he printed one of her silkscreen images of the singer. Used snapshot. , Several judges of the court expressed their opposition to this decision, feeling that it could stifle creativity in art, music or literature.
The Ed Sheeran plagiarism case has, without a doubt, been the most cover-filling case over the last year. The singer was sued for copyright infringement for his song thinking too much which reportedly looked like let’s get It onBy Marvin Gaye. A complaint was filed in 2017 by the heirs of the song’s co-writer Ed Townsend, who noted similarities between the chord progressions, harmonic rhythms, and some of the melodies of the two songs. However, a New York court determined that there was no plagiarism. Sheeran said that these were “misleading comparisons”.
In the case of Lana Del Rey, the American misuse of an existing work in a video has not been prosecuted because she reached an agreement with the two original artists, one audio and the other visual.
Jamaican and reggaeton rhythms
Steely & Cleavy Productions Ltd., a Jamaican production company, accused over 100 reggaeton artists, such as the successful El Chombo, Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee, of “illegally using” elements of the internationally known rhythm in their songs. have put. demonetization, Producers call this case illegal interpolation of the rhythm of their song fish market And they claim both credit and associated copyrights on all songs created with that beat.
The lawsuit cites 77 songs, including reggaeton hits like slowlyFonsi and Daddy Yankee’s collaboration, or petrol, by Yankee. At its first hearing on October 20, Judge Andre Birotte Jr. expressed concern that the lawsuit could curb creativity in the musical genre.
genius vs google
The Supreme Court of the United States refused to accept the appeal presented by the website Genius, which aimed to continue the fight against Google, a company accused of unfairly transcribing song lyrics in search engine results – without a license. Was accused of using. The case started in 2019. Genius alleged that Google copied and published the letters at the top of search results without permission, diverting web traffic that should have gone to the Genius site.
The website apparently does not own any copyrights on the songs, which belong to the artists or publishers, but she has accused the web giant of violating its terms of service by stealing and republishing her work. Although Genius reported that it used encryption to demonstrate Google’s bad practices, the Supreme Court did not pursue the case.
Aretha Franklin’s wishes
Add and continue the open battle over Aretha Franklin’s will. More than five years later, the battle continues to determine which of her wills will guide the administration of her estate. The singer had no formal will and the dispute pits her son, Ted White II, who supports a 2010 document, which is owned by Kecalfe and Edward Franklin, with a 2014 inheritance text. Both were discovered in Diva’s house. Soul A few months after his death from pancreatic cancer in 2018, in suburban Detroit.
There are significant differences between the handwritten documents, although both indicate that the children will share all income from their music and its copyrights, which would demonstrate that this is not the most controversial issue and will be focused on what is essential. Managing Franklin’s legacy.