One of the prosecutors explained why after the reconstruction of the incident the hypothesis that Lone had been kidnapped became dominant.

One of the prosecutors investigating the disappearance of Loan Danilo PenaThe 5-year-old child, who had been desperately searched for over a week in the Corrientes town of 9 de Julio, gave birth this Thursday to a cause that not only gave rise to the hypothesis that the minor could have been kidnapped, but that he had become the main one in the last hours.

The breaking point compared to the previous days, in which the work was practically focused only on the possibility that the debt was lost in the mountains, was Reconstruction of the event Which is what happened this Wednesday to the minors who were with him last week when they went to collect oranges after a family lunch.

“The reconstruction had a very important outcome. We travelled the entire route that he took on that occasion. Being at the scene of the incident gave us a clear picture of the distances, the route he took and the The hypothesis starts to weaken as it is lost and some other hypothesis becomes stronger“, he began his explanation William Barry In conversation with Tamil Nadu,

He said that during the excursion the minors told under what circumstances and where the little boy ran away, who was never seen again by anyone.

During the visit, the minors were accompanied by professionals from the Victim Care and Assistance Unit (UNAAVI), the Forensic Psychology Corps and the Ministry of Public Guardianship.

“That the search took place almost immediately and he was not found is shocking and in turn reinforces suspicions about the detainees”The prosecutor said.

At the moment, there is Three arrestedAll were charged with abandoning the person: Bernardino Antonio Benítez, the boy’s uncleand some of his friends, Daniel Oscar “Fierito” Ramirez And Monica Del Carme Milapi,

“The concrete thing is that the three people who have been detained and charged, in principle, with releasing the man, until the debt appears, are the ones responsible for his disappearance. They are the last people he had contact with and they will have to give a solid explanation.Barry highlighted.

In this sense, the judicial officer revealed an important novelty, which is that Jorge Monti, who until now had been the lawyer for the three defendants, resigned from representing Benitez this afternoon.Who will be an official defender from now on until a new lawyer is appointed.

,None of the other defendants or those who attended the lunch saw Benitez again after his disappearance until around 6:00 p.m.. A witness testified that she saw him at 6:00 p.m. with a naked torso; she believed he had come from a manhunt, the prosecutor commented skeptically.

for now, None of the three prisoners agreed to give a statement. Earlier, the Public Prosecutor’s Office issued a statement informing that investigators are awaiting the results of examination of cell phone antennas, analysis of seized mobile devices and luminol tests carried out on two vehicles belonging to the three detained men. .

Prosecutors hope these tests “will shed light on the investigation, although due to its volume and complexity the results will only be known in the next few hours.” According to Barry, the luminol test will be performed tonight. The result of the raid conducted so far was negative.

“We will have a much clearer picture when we process the content from the phone”They also cautioned that an intensive search of the area would continue because they still could not rule out that the loan was lost, Barry said.

Meanwhile, the missing child’s family is also divided over legal representation. While María Noguera, the mother, is advised by Fabián Lucero and Néstor Luque, the father, José Pena, is represented by his lawyer, Roberto Méndez.