Review of Ciné: Kinds of Kindness (2024)

Kindness // Yorgos Lanthimos. With Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons and Willem Dafoe.

Avek Types of kindnessYorgos Lanthimos, a realist who captivated audiences with his works that tell Favorite and others. Poor creaturesour book has a completely different cinematic experience. Despite the prestigious casting and the increased attention, this film reveals its advantages, not allowing to go beyond the limits of cinematic experiments, but not completely. “L’une des premières” chooses what can be done Types of kindness This is casting. Lanthimos was forced to turn to the actors of his previous film, and not to Emma Stone, Willem Dafoe, Jesse Plemons and Margaret Qualley, who were waiting for the directors with success in previous works. The Realist is an exploiter of the maximum talent of these actors and their entrusted roles in the three segments of the film. Chaque actor endosse des personanages différents, montrant ainsi leur versatility and leur abilié à navigator entre entre diversified registers.

“TYPES OF KINDNESS” is a fairy tale and a triptych that fits: a man without a choice, who holds control over his own life; A restless policeman seems to have shot a woman who was returning and looked like a different person; And the woman decided to find a very precise person, endowed with a special power, who is destined to become a child prodigy chef.

Despite this display of talent, the film doesn’t allow you to use the best manners of the cast to make an impression. Jesse Plemons, in particular, shines in his role, because he appreciates the Male Interpretation Prize at Cannes. Importantly, the performance fails to maintain the film’s narrative structure, which is consistent with its own words. Lanthimos’s choice of divider Types of kindness in three distinct segments it is not so ambiguous, but this is what makes the film so faible. Each segment is made up of loud and complex themes, about psychological enterprises, about marital violence and sectarian fanaticism. Because these subjects are so persistent and captivating, they tend to be more cohesive and productive. The first segment, focused on affective dependence, once again captures attention thanks to its palpable tension and brutal staging. However, it is good for the unique styles that make it superfluous and detract from the attention of the central ideas.

The second segment, an allegory of marital abuse, is a villainy that is the cause of a reasonable impact that is a dilution of impact. The attempts to provoke and shock the audience are cunning and lead to a clumsy execution. The three segments exploring religious fanaticism are probably the most feasible of the three. The souffre of a que épuise de rythme is blatant and the dune durée is excessive that épuise the patience of the viewer. The film is a s’éterniser sans veritable, but with a very difficult emotional subtext. Yorgos Lanthimos is the son of a distinctive visual style and talent, creating an atmosphere that is oppressive and destructive. Dance Types of kindnesshe often engages in the capture of Anguas and the disorientation of these characters, noting the choice of cadrage and illumination that alters the characterization of his own psyche. In any case, these qualities of vision do not compensate for the script’s errors.

L’humour noir, the brand of the Lanthimos factory, fait quelques apparitions bienvenues, but it is not enough for all those films that seem to be spectators in their ambitions. Lanthimos’ approach, which consists of rejecting restrictions and challenging conventions, is a transformer in provocation that makes love and essence. The recurring characteristics of Lanthimos’s work are related to the harshness and misanthropy of human nature. Dance Types of kindnessthis misanthropy is omnipresent, each part of the film is deep in aspects plus dark and human aspects. If it concerns without concessions, it can be fascinating in certain works, in this case it will be free and forceful, as the implementer who will become a shocker for the shocker’s game, without a real message. The central segment, which demonstrates the dynamics of the couple “pouvoir au sein d’un”, is probably most reminiscent of this three. Obviously, this part of the film is not an excuse for the excessive length of the project in the ensemble.

Ce segment montre clairement la volonté de Lanthimos de bousculer les spectateurs, mais il le fait d’une manière qui semble plus sincere calculations. Types of kindness s’inscrit malheureusement dans la ligée des Films qui, Malgré des Ambientes évidentes, échouent à atteindre leur plein potentiel. After a successful hold Favorite and others. Poor creaturesil était peut-être inevitably, that Lanthimos realized his mistake. Cela arrived in aux plus grands cinéastes, and even worse, this film simply found itself in brackets in a brilliant career. Realizers who want independent cinema are recognized for their courage, having gone through several stages or through this meme, having passed through the channels of their projects. Lanthimos was delighted with the excessive confidence in his own style, which was not in the film plus the pretentiousness that is appropriate.

In conclusion, Types of kindness This is a film that I have seen, both in its structure and in its content. A poor casting of the film and an impeccable technique of realization, the film does not take a long time to capture and leave a vacant impression. For fans of Yorgos Lanthimos, this film is a wonderful deception, a work that, although unsuccessful, has the justification of its length and several narratives. He does not know that Lanthimos will return again for his future projects, and will return to the balance between audacity and professionalism that will be the fact of the return.

Note: 3/10. In short, I am a big fan of Yorgos Lanthimos and I am deeply saddened. A little dish that failed.

Sort June 26, 2024 in cinemas