The author’s process of announcing the group “Trompeza” of the group “Yesterday” is completed
After two years of proceedings, the case regarding the trailer available to some viewers, in which Ana de Armas appears, is finally closed…
This is a deal you have achieved. Two years, two Americans, Paul Michael Rosa and Conor Wolf, are digging into a hallucinatory trial against Universal studios, which are waiting for a “troublesome presence” in the ad group Yesterday, sorted in 2019. Cause? Presence of the actress Ana de Armas in this additional question that this is the last device that is the only one in the film project.
Recently, the two sides have not reached an agreement, but the terms have not been disclosed. Another possibility is that timelines and silver money in endless trials are a sure-fire ending that disappoints plaintiffs and studios. Deux ans plus tard, “l’affaire” “Yesterday” Est définitivement du passé.
Universal font for “message opening announcement”!
An Ode to the Beatles, the film is the farewell story of Jack (Himesh Patel), a failed singer who awakens after an inexplicable blackout about the world or whether the Beatles ever existed. Il est donc le seul à les connaître. A lucky break for this artist who is capitalizing on the situation to reimagine the songs of the Fab Four. Jack’s pairing of “Hey Jude” and “Let It Be” made a name for himself just before he offered a gig with Ed Sheeran. Additional information from Ana de Armas: Jack’s romantic interest in the Lily James film. If you are a realist, Danny Boyle (Trainspotting, 28 days plus late). blonde you’re doing an encore Haunted in the trailer for the film “Puisse faire autant de bruit”.
Paul Michael and Conor confirm they have the loudest voice “Yesterday” on Google Play right now, with Ana De Armas in the advert Yesterday, per modification $3.99. Disagréablement Surpris de ne pas Retrouver l’Actrice qui a été coupée au Montage après que les équipes aient jugé inutile le maintien de la scène (le héros du movie tombait amoureux d’elle après l’avoir croisée sur un plato télé), les deux The people decided to open the court in California and direct their efforts against the studio Universal, which is distributing the long-running film.
First, the plaintiffs are ont remis en Cause l’integrité de la publicité. The studios defend and confirm that the announcement groups are protégés of the artistic works as amended by the Prime Minister. The judge ruled in favor of Rose and Wolfe. I declare:
“Universal is that the ad strips offer a certain amount of creative and editorial freedom. But most of all, this creative activity is not associated with commercial advertising of the nature of the film offered to fans of watching the film.”
Une victoire pour les deux hommes qui Soulève Néanmoins une Question: Si les Bande-Annonces Sont des Publicités, les spectateurs pourraient poursuivre en Justice les Studios à Chaque fois Qu’un Film N’est pas à la Hauteur de Leur Espérance à la Suite d ‘trailer.
In the content of this return, my defenders of the collective appeals of Cody R. LeJeune confirmed that all viewers who want to watch the film or online were in the finale, and they received their comeuppance. Une donnée difficile à Calculator… Quant à Universal, les studios ont reclamé un remboursement des frais judiciaires de la part des plaintiffs.
The case’s former attorney, Steven Wilson, turned down two men who were seeking $5 million in damages. I declare: “Poursuivre les débats à ce sujet ne serait que futilité.” Selon les studios, le mieux que ces men can get a high return of $7.98.
After the last two months and depending on cents of dollars in a paltry process for the Hollywood giant, compromise is a godsend. Many of the two parties do not satisfy the problem of this process. For the complainants, cela montre encore une que la cour de Justice California est régie in favor of the film industry.
The case is officially closed, but will never be solved.
28 years later: Nia DaCosta realized the suite