You’re wrong if you think Bethesda should change their graphics engine. A Skyrim veteran says it’s more complicated than it seems – The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Talking about Bethesda’s graphics engine is quite a difficult question because developer of The Elder Scrolls and Fallout has every reason support Creation Engine before your next video games. However, the community has repeatedly expressed its desire that Bethesda is changing its graphics engine given the limitations of the current one. The first and most important thing to note is that the Creation Engine has been a key tool in developing great games. open world.

Although he received many updates To adapt it to current standards, as can be seen in some aspects of Starfield, the reality is that changing the graphics engine is very difficult task even for such a large studio as Bethesdadue to the enormous investment of time and resources. Fact replay toolsdevelopment of systems and implementation of new work processes will lead to Internal release delay for future Bethesda video games.

We also cannot forget the fact that developers will need a learning period and adaptation since Bethesda has been using the Creation Engine since birth Gamebryowhich was used until 2011 in games such as Oblivion, Morrowind or Fallout 3. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim was released that same year, and it was this game that gave way to the evolution of the Creation Engine we know today.

Even despite these difficulties, players’ motives for Bethesda to change the engine they are clearespecially considering that Bethesda games usually release with numerous technical issues such as performance problemsmistakes, outdated animations as well as technical debt. We’ll talk about this latest concept below thanks to statements from Bruce Nesmith, Skyrim’s lead designer, who gave an interview to Videogamer.

Why is Bethesda’s graphics engine suite changing?

While switching graphics engines can provide a number of benefits that you didn’t have before, it may not be the best decision for Bethesda. “We’re discussing the game engine, let’s discuss the game. The game engine is not the main thingThe game engine is at the service of the game itself. YOU and I could name a hundred lousy games that used Unreal. Is Unreal to blame for this? No, it’s not Unreal’s fault.“, he points out.

“Gamebryo is no longer a business; it stopped being one a long time ago. But this engine has been tuned, updated and improved constantly create exactly the games that Bethesda makes: The Elder Scrolls, Fallouts, Starfield. It’s perfectly tailored for this type of game,” he explains. He says that switch to Unreal Engine 5For example, this would mean a radical change in how Bethesda operates because that would mean it would take several years to implement correctly.

The latter is translated into slower developmentalong training process and high cost, which can only pay off after a few years. “Should you upgrade to Unreal Engine 5? You need to do cost-benefit analysis. The cost of moving to Unreal will be the initial development that will need to be done to try to bring what you’re already used to doing into Unreal,” he explains.

“It would be – I’ll just give a number that probably isn’t real – a year or two of technical work just to transfer it to the engine as is. And then, more work on setting up the engine, setting up the game and working on it. That’s the risk side,” he says. However, “the advantage is that a lot of tech debt lost“, there are numerous limitations and problems that arise because the Creation Engine base is not very modern and some aspects have been redesigned or replaced to adapt to the current times.

This is largely due to the accumulation outdated codebugs that can occur during development, inefficient performance (here is the famous Starfield loading time), and a lack of compatibility with new technologies. It’s true that Bethesda has many limitations in the Creation Engine, but Nesmith ends up limiting himself to video games.because what matters is that we have a good name.

The game is more important than the graphics engine

“There are parts of the Gamebryo engine that I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that Bethesda can no longer compile because original source code no longer compiles. You should use the compiled material as is. But when arguing about whether to use this or that engine, the engine is in the service of the game. Is the game good? I don’t care what engine. The game is good. Let’s play a game“, he states. Of course, we cannot close this publication without first talking about the phenomenon of modding.

Mods and Bethesda have a very special relationship, but the truth is that its graphics engine allows the community share your creations with relative ease. Skyrim, Fallout and Starfield are modder’s paradise, but Nesmith thinks we should do it. give priority to the quality of the gameand then create a path to make things easier for authors. “You have to make the best game you can, and once you do that, look at your modding community and ask them, ‘How can I help you?'” he says.

“But you can’t let them needs of the mod community dictate whether the game is what it should be. Because If you make a bad game, you won’t have a modding community.“, he concludes. However, he also devoted a few words to modder tools, which need to be updated every time a Bethesda game receives an update. “The modding community has a huge technological debt, Script Extender is probably easier to talk about.”

“Unfortunately, Script Extender needs to be updated. Every time a new game update comes out. modders put a lot of effort into it in understanding the assembly mechanism and assembly tools. If there is a cut, it all goes out the window and we have to start again,” he concludes.

In 3D games | Starfield guide with all the cheats, collectibles, secrets and missions to complete the game 100%.

In 3D games | Everything I would like to see improved in The Elder Scrolls VI is to make its open world feel much larger than Skyrim’s graphics.