After sunset, cinema and Mexican screenwriter Michel Franco exploded with memories. This dramatic tour in New York celebrates Jessica Chastain’s return to the big screen after Time of Armageddon, Peter Sarsgaard and Brooke Timber.
Costume for Sylvia, a woman who leads a simple life organized by her children, work and AA meetings. Purtan, his memories of Saul’s Boulevard dedicated to existence, illustrious souvenirs that remained a thing of the past in his youth.
Presentation of the Venice Bridge 2023, Memory of Value Peter Sarsgaard a male interpretation of the Coupe Volpi de la meilleure.
What do audiences think of the premieres? Memory ? Time of our écrivons ces lignes, long time signature for one note and spectators for 3.8 minutes at 5. Memory for 113 notes and 22 internships for criticism, 19 for film notes at least 3 scenes.
Ils on aim
Ombeline Marchon lui donne la note maxe et écrit: “A tabloid film, great delicacy and strong emotions that are a small story, small and small, according to the indexes. He didn’t say it was the real truth in the ending, but the two main characters were lost, perclus de douleur. Le Film Reste Toujours Pudique, en Retenue, Laissant l’Emotion Affleurer without violins, without style effects. When the genérique de fin comes, larmes montent, and you come to the conclusion that le poids de ce que l’on voit, or ce qui n’est pas dit à l’écran, se libère. Comme dans Babel, for example, Iñárritu. Three great, three beautiful films performed by the impeccable Jessica Chastain.“
Pour Laurent Stephane B: “This film is a decoration of tenderness and justice. Jessica Chastain and Peter Sarsgaard and brilliant melancolia. My best film since debuting this 2024.”
Theorem 2023
Memory
Disse wrote: “Tabloid film. Actuators are sensor devices. I love it very much. “Jessica Chastain also won a prize in Venice.”
Gaby Cluis attributes the note 4/8 and écrit: “An inspiring film. On croit savoir à quoi s’attendre au depart mais il n’en est rien Finalement. Réalisation bien menée. Scénario très bien ficelé et un très bon casting; tonnerre d’applaudissements à Peter Sarsgaard dont le jeu est touchant” “
Selon Jerome Sdc: “A magnificent tragicomedy, realized mainly in the master; The script is very good, the leisurely viewer in the castle and in the unfolded state of the drama, all very refined (and icy parfois) acting in an ensemble of actors, in a big movie, pas tres loin “of a mythical holiday.”
Ils ont moins aimé
Joce2012 take a look at movie 3.5 and explain: “The film is a difficult man, a car that has two plots that are very different, and a script that is a man who is confusing.
Theorem 2023
Memory
Selenie du Club AlloCiné met 3/5 in the film and in the cinema: “Debut – three academicians, a class meeting and three retellings in American cinema performed by famous anonymous alcoholics on the eve of a meeting with a man whose soul was torn out of questions that were never answered…
Mise en place de l’histoire et des personnages is perhaps an experienced person, or in all cases passez travaillée. Par là même le lien aurges + alcoolisme n’est pas du tout convaincant, le second parameter – même Finalement assez superflu et ne sert qu’à rajouter du pathos au mélo (or l’inverse!) car le sujet reste bel et bien la memoirs. The name “Evocator” is simple and clear, like the image of any film.
The scene is written evenly, appropriately from below, exactly in shape. However, the extreme sobriety of a long film consists of two small souls, a monotonous rhythm and protagonists who are all étonnante maîtrise de soi, ce qui parait presque surréaliste quand on parle d’amnésie ou de démence. In conclusion, if manque d’intensité ça reste une jolie histoire d’amour, then quasi-incredible, but more likely and touching between two shining moments.”
Theorem 2023
Memory
Selon has no mercy: “Le theme assez lourd du movie ne s’annonce qu’assez tard dans la Narration. Ce qui rend la première demièure un peu ennuyeuse, pesonte. The bathroom at said location may be more than anything else. To misinterpret Chastain, Sarsgaard and Timber, the implementer’s point may be obvious. “L’ambiance est assez bien Rendue mais il manque un peu d’intensité pour nous faire vibrar.”
Pour Mikael D: “Un bon bon scénario, des acteurs en état de Grace, alors qu’est-ce qui ne Marche pas? Peut-être trop de confiance dans ce qui precède, et surtout une micse en scène Lens, en long Plans fixes, une continuity gestures and useless scenes, repetitions, loud silence, without tension, without any idea of cinema.
Ce qui vide le movie de tout enjeu, de toute émotion, un combined vu le sujet. A person who is an implementer cannot leave the network. On his arrival he borrowed a long and long catalog of injuries of all kinds – le monde semblant aujourd’hui se resumer à ça. I saw, when I had a strong family explanation scene and an unpredictable plan, how I returned to monotony.“
Memory this is for the cinema.