President Xavier Miley’s image has fallen in 14 provinces

President Xavier Miley’s image deteriorated 14 out of 24 provinces According to a survey released, during May, compared to the previous month CB Consulting Public Opinion,

the decline in the perception of the president, coinciding with Worsening economic and employment slowdown in industrial sectorsThe effect was more profound in Buenos Aires Province, where the drop was 3.5%, the most pronounced on record. The district that manages Axel Kicillof Liberal economists have the worst image (54%) in second place, just below santiago del estero (54.8%).

Although the drop in May is normal, the truth is that in 5 provinces the head of state has a more negative image than a positive one: Buenos Aires, Chaco, land of Fire, Formosa and Santiago del Estero. The biggest positive image of this month was seen in this province Córdoba

(64.8%). There, it increased by 2.9%, which may respond to the festive effect 25th MayEven though Miley traveled to carry out an official activity, the promised “May Pact” was not fulfilled.

Other notable data was the impact of the crisis Missionsfollowing the police revolt and teaching and public employee strikes. Positive image fell from 52.4% to 49.7%, by about 2.7 points.

The situation is more shocking Tucumana traditional stronghold of Peronism and one of the most populous districts in the north. There, the president’s positive image fell by 3 points in a month, from 56.6 to 53.6%. This data is in contrast to the perception of the governor Osvaldo Jaldoa president who distanced himself from the Unión por la Patria and formed an alliance with Miley. Jaldo was in third place in positive image this month, with 63.7% in favor and an increase of 0.4 points compared to the previous period.

In addition to Jaldo, on the podium of governors with the best ratings in June are Maximiliano Pullaro (UCR)from Santa Fe, with 64.3%, which allowed him to lead the ranking, while Ignacio Torres (PRO)from Chubut, came in third. These are two leaders who show a particular profile: they are young, they maintain a position of cooperation with the government, but they do not hesitate to strain relations with Miley.

May had the worst ratings Axel Kicillofwith a 40.3% positive image, which leaves it in last place. It follows Ricardo Quintela, from La Rioja, with 41.2%, and Gustavo SanzFrom Salta, with a 44.5% positive image.

The governor who had the highest increase compared to the last measurement of the consulting firm was Alberto Weretilneck (+3.1%), while again, in Misiones, the governor Hugo Passalacqua It was the one that declined the most, falling 5.4% as a result of strong opposition.

At the local level, changes also took place in the interior of the country. The three mayors most valued by their neighbors at the federal level in June Gustavo SastreOf Puerto Madryn (58.1%), followed by Roger Nedian La Banda (57.7%), and Leandro Stellato From Posadas (57.5%).

In contrast, the three mayors with the worst image in their cities this month are: Walter Vuot The city of Ushuaia (37.7%) comes in last, followed by Armando Molina from La Rioja (39.6%) and Walter Cortez From Bariloche (40.5%).

Interesting is the fact that a leader from an important municipal district had a good performance: Julio Alcé, from La Plata, was the one who increased his image the most compared to the previous measurement (+2.2%), while Mariano Gaido, Neuquen fell the most, dropping 3.5 percent.

Object of population study: general population over 16 years of age

Scope: 23 provinces of Argentina + CABA

Quota: Gender, educational level, geographical location and age group.

Insert: Similar Information Collection Techniques: CB CAWI Research (Online)

Information collection instrument: Structured questionnaire of closed questions with direct application.

Provinces

Total samples by province: 18,625 total cases (average 620 – 1,285 cases per province)

Average sampling error: +/- 3 to 4%

Field work: June 1 to 4, 2024

Sampling procedure: Stratified by provincial districts.

Municipalities

Sample size by municipalities: 10,399 total cases (average 378-567 cases per municipality)

Average sampling error: +/- 4 to 5%

Field work: June 1 to 4, 2024

Sampling procedure: Stratified by municipal districts.