“The best result was for Depor, which missed Eremaj”

The best result for Deportivo was that they barely played their best football in the final quarter of an hour when they were 0-1 down.

True, there were very few shots on goal in the first half, with Sporting dominating the first 15 minutes. There were virtually no opportunities worth mentioning created in the lead encounter.

Without causing much damage, the first blow came in the 38th minute thanks to Nick

who was going to win Yanezbut the truth is that in the first act the goalkeepers behaved like mere spectators with very few worthwhile interventions.

There were many midfielders, but few players; The Deportivo team has an alarming deficit in terms of development of the game. From midfield they don’t find the right tactics to overpower and disrupt the opposition, they are not a dominant team and I think in many cases this team could perhaps be better at counter-attacking, giving up possession somewhat and using pace. into a counterattack, as he has done before in matches such as Albacete or Cartagena. This is not a one-touch team, it is difficult for them to connect the game.

There is also a lack of a player who dares to shoot from outside the penalty area when the team is stuck.
Lucas Perez He is always responsible for taking the whole game from set pieces, but it seems that the strategy is not developed enough to deceive the opponent.

“Seven” still managed to take advantage of the indecision of two visiting players in the game on goal, making a measured pass with excellent subsequent clarity of the shot. David Mella.

Christian Herrera He had the opportunity to score the winning goal but missed.

The result is just right for a formation that misses badly. Eremaipractically the only white-blue with iridescence and fantasy.