The madness of a missed goal, Monica Planas

The disallowed goal against Leipzig immediately after the start of the match with Real did not raise any doubts among either the narrator or the match commentators. Movistar+ after watching a replay of the performance. “We missed something because there was a feeling that it was quite possible,” he said. Carlos Martinez. And he added: “Everyone is sitting in the press boxes and saying, how? “We don’t know what happened!” Alvaro Benito He even asked someone to enlighten them because they couldn’t interpret the referee’s decision. Martinez insisted: “If this were a match against Spain, we would be burning fireworks here right now!” Before Mateu Laos He lamented the situation: “This is madness. Giving up this goal is madness. “This is not football.” And Carlos Martinez half an hour later, after watching another replay, expanded his analysis: “After watching the play, it turns out to be less than nothing! Henrichs “He didn’t make the slightest touch.”

The next day, Manu Carreno V “Removing four marks” announced: “And now we are talking about a controversial move that, oddly enough, turned out to be successful.” And he explained to the audience: “This player is offside, and the regulations say that if you are offside, you cannot interfere with the game. And obviously that happens in this play.” He believed that this was a matter of taste: “You may like the regulations more or less, but here he (Henrichs) plays Lunin” And he stated emphatically: “There is no more controversy than what we want to see, because the judge in this case applied the rules well. Henriks touched Lunin, and the goal was not counted.” Despite differences of opinion Toni Kroosthey got involved in explanations Thierry Henry about the regulations and even with a fragment (slightly edited) of the broadcast RAC1 pto highlight concerns about Henrichs’ contact with the goalkeeper. And Carreño concluded: “Thierry Henry seems to know the rules,” appealing to the ignorance of those who interpreted otherwise. IN Gamers They confirmed that the goal was called off and pointed to interference as a key factor: “Intervene. “The main word in football!” Or “Get involved! A word to keep in mind!”

There is a huge difference between the spontaneity of a live match and the next day’s news, even with regulation experts. Intervention, of course, does take place, although not all of it comes from the Henrys.

a matter of taste

In every arbitration dispute, a very interesting trend is observed. When news anchors do not share the decision of the VAR, then the problem is the quality of the judges and the scandal with the leadership of the VAR. When they agree with VAR’s decision despite disagreement, then excuses arise such as “depending on the color they will see it one way or another” or “you may like the regulation more or less.” But it always comes out to 36.