The Attorney General’s Office announces the expansion of the investigation into President Dina Bolwart Rolex case. Except when adding to an alleged offense committed by the President, public ministry It was decided to involve the governor of Ayacucho, Wilfredo Oscorrima, in the proceedings.
Through a statement, the unit explained that “through the Area of Illicit Enrichment and Constitutional Complaints, in tax file number 68-2024, against Dina Ersilía Boluarte Zegarra for the crimes of illegal enrichment and failure to file statements in documents The case was prosecuted, it was decided to understand the alleged commission of “The crime of improper passive bribery.”
Furthermore, he mentioned that the alleged offense with which the Regional Officer would be charged General active bribery.
The crime of bribery is known as bribery. It is basically a series of acts in which a reward, not necessarily money, is requested, accepted or offered in return for work done in the exercise of public service.
In the case of the head of state, he has been accused of undue liabilities. It refers to when a public official directly or indirectly accepts, receives or requests undue donations or benefits while acting in a manner consistent with his or her official duties, without failing to discharge his or her duty. The restrictions are as follows:
While the alleged crime general active bribery It is attributed to the Regional Governor of Ayacucho, which applies when a citizen offers, gives or promises a donation or benefit to a public official so that he or she fails to fulfill his or her obligations. Acts against or abandons his obligations without any reason. , The restrictions are:
As discussed further in conversation with lawyer Hugo Mendoza Infobay Peru, The fact that the President has assured that the Rolex and the jewelery were given ‘as a loan’ by the Ayacucho Governor This does not relieve him of responsibility.
“The The prosecutor’s office must investigate the person from whom the watches and jewelry came, in this case Wilfredo Oscorima, Because it may establish the ability to trace the subsequent benefit to the person who lent or gave. For example, I give or lend something, in this case a watch, and then they benefit from a good bid on me. How is it implemented? with public resources, so We will have to face the crimes of corruption of officials
“, he explained.“Add to this that if we are going to review that paper or that contract file in detail and find gross irregularities that indicate there was an address, then it is clear that this watch should be interpreted as a promise Could be an advantage issue for bribery” he continued.
Similarly, he mentioned that even if something was done which was part of their duties, if only expediting or priority was given for the delivery of these jewels, then this is also illegal.
SommareSelena Gomez, international star and pop icon, encounters body-shaming episode titles on her driving routes.…
afp_tickers This content was published 08 November 2024 - 13:35 Nearly 70% of those killed…
Survival of breast cancer, the most common cancer among women: in Spain there are 35,000…
afp_tickers This content was published on November 8, 2024 - 12:29 pm The Federal Reserve…
As happens every year around this time, we're at the perfect time to upgrade our…
The tennis season will officially end on ATP Finalscompetition in which the top eight players…