“They accused us of robbery” and “nothing was ruled out”: the main definitions of prosecutors in the loan case

The Prosecutor of Goya William Barry And Juan Carlos Castillo This afternoon he stopped being a capture case instructor Loan Danilo Penaa 5-year-old boy who disappeared on June 13 in the town of 9 de Julio, province of Corrientes. The file went to the Federal Justice, precisely because they accused 5 of the detainees of a crime Recruitment of people for the purposes of exploitation: trafficking.

Barry and Castillo were clear in their perceptions and marked the moment in their testimony and was recorded by witnesses as a turning point in the case. sniffer dogs. This was after they confirmed that Lone had not left the grounds of his grandmother’s home, a police officer was providing them with information about Trout, and that two vehicles belonging to the ship’s captain-turned-captive couple had the child’s fingerprints (again). Carlos Perez and former municipal official Maria Callava: He was accused of this Material co-author of loan acquisition.

,Neither hypothesis was ever put to rest.one related to the loss and the other, related to carrying the baby, ”Castillo began to explain. Then focus on the moment when they realized they were unhindered The reason for the commissioner of the 9th Julio, Walter Macielnow imprisoned and charged Barricade By royal grace, qualified by the gravity of the previous offence and the author’s position as a public official, he put them in.

“We understood that there was a Obstacle in the investigation of the search for the minor,” Castillo said and added: “In March, the commissioner served a summons to the neighbors to go to the Public Prosecutor’s Office to declare something about the incident (when they did not know anything). In front of such Complaint before us, compromised the course of the investigation and It got us confused,

Meanwhile Barry began discussing the topic: “They put the loot on usand we know he did that. “We trusted the information he gave us.”

Barry details how he closed the door on the hypothesis about a missing child: “The trip with the kids was very informative”.not only what he said in the Geisel Chamber, but during Reconstruction as well.

“We took them to the spot and they told us the entire route they took. The most important thing was to see where they forgot the loan and, from those demonstrations, the picture became clear: When he was last seen they all agreed on the direction he took. I was going to granny’s house”, he explained the key to the case.

There he realized that there was a fence on the left side of the path leading to grandmother’s house and in a straight line was a mountain: “For a child under 5 years of age who has never been to the field, it is difficult to stop, scream, cry, come back. This was an enlightening guideline that disabled the presumption of harm.,

Judicial officials later explained the reason for this Antonio Benitez and Monica del Carmen MilpiHe has now been charged with a smuggling offence Primary participants Near Daniel “Fierito” Ramirezthe place where Lone was last seen. “None of us could tell how, where or when (they lost sight of the child). At the very least, they should have expressed time and place guidelines,” he said. And he added: “The minors’ version was strong and consistent, they agreed.”

In that context, Barry reflected on all of this. Weak loss hypothesis,The collection is recognized.We have the elements but we are not going to reveal them because it arises from analysis of the phone and we do not want to compromise the investigation.

He was then asked about the possibility that the captured ship captain (RE) might be in charge of the scheme and that his wife might have political connections: “We have an X-ray of personalities and relationships; and that arises from communication. In theory, I agree that there is more involvement in the organizational part of those accused,” he expanded on Perez and his partner.

And he kept remembering that the police officer had been accused of obstructing the case.“He let them go” as Perez and his wife headed for the Chaco province.. “The person who was supposed to tell us the news did not do it properly,” he indicated about his confidence in the information provided by Commissioner Maciel. We moved quickly from there to the bad faith of that person … I trusted the forces, said Prosecutor Barry.

Then, they consulted him about Lon’s grandmother, Catalina, and the suspicions that came upon her. On that point they were clear: “For those who were there at lunchtime that day, there’s nothing on the table.”

And after declaring himself incompetent in the case because the crime being investigated is of a federal nature, Castillo assured that he would not leave the case aside: “I am committed to helping protect federal justice.”

The case has already entered the Human Trafficking and Exploitation Prosecutor’s Office (Protex), who is now in charge of the file.

The sniffer dogs that participated in the search through the lawn were key. Prosecutors did not hesitate to consider it. “They always kept an eye on the area between Grandma’s house and the orange grove. of 25 Dog Binomial If he had gone out from there, someone would have had to follow him, but no. Obviously, they haven’t left the area“, he highlighted.

And he also commented that the muddy loot was about 3 kilometres away from Lone’s grandmother’s house and that the dogs had tested positive for the boy’s shoes.

“The spot was marked because the shoe was there, but No dog saw any trace anywhere, The shoe was kept in the same place.It was a clear change of scene of the incident, and with commitment and full criminal responsibility, it was attributed to the commissioner of July 9,” he said, describing how Maciel delayed the case.

In addition, he “Excellent“The work the dogs did was on two vehicles belonging to the couple, a retired ship captain and now a former municipal official. “(They marked a trail) to some extent, in the truck and, 100 percent, Ford’s“, he said and elaborated what that meant: “He spent less time in the van in which the defendant traveled to his grandmother’s house; and higher in the The Ford in which he was transported.

With that red vehicle, a Ford Ka, the couple traveled around the province Chaco without even the prosecutors knowing. For this reason, raids were ordered on two houses in the city this weekend Patience Linked to the accused: They found weapons, money, and 8 fingerprints.

For this reason, prosecutors Barry and Castillo accused Pérez and his wife of recruiting the minor as co-authors for the purpose of exploiting her. As for the other three, they considered that their primary participation was: ““They created all the relevant mechanisms to create distraction so that the child is captured.”

And he concluded: “That’s why we abandoned the harm hypothesis and focused on the collection line, which we worked on from the beginning and which was strengthened with evidentiary material.”