With Franco in the Senate, the ruling party gained favorable opinion for the Bases Law

The ruling party wanted to close the debate on the Aadhaar law this Wednesday and sign a text with the intention of converting it into an opinion, but it could not get the required number of signatures due to lack of support from the opposition and will not reach the venue for the time being.However, the new chief of staff, Guillermo Francos, has moved to the Senate and is holding crucial talks tonight to lift the ban on the office.

To understand this delicate scenario, it is important to look at the members of the commissions that discussed the issue. Budget and Treasury, the official who commands Ezequiel Attauchehas 17 members, of which 10 are from the ruling party and the democratic opposition; the rest, from Kirchnerism.

The same situation applies to ordinary legislation – the heads of debate on base legislation – which is managed by the provisional president of the Upper House, Bartolome Abdalla. Meanwhile, the Department of Constitutional Affairs is headed by a dissident Peronist Edgardo Cuider

and has 19 members: 11 from the ruling party and the dialogue opposition, and eight Kirchnerists.

To make such a decision, the signature of half of each commission member is required. They do not have to be almost the same text, since there may be several dispatches. However, even with that option the objective was not achieved this Wednesday,

A few minutes before the plenary session, one of the commission members, a man from Santa Cruz Jose Maria Carambiaannounced by note that it would present its own office. By leaving open the date for the completion of said task, it removed – for now – the inclusion of a rubric in the debate. A mischief against the interests of the ruling party, which once again sinned with anxiety and allowed itself to be led wrongly once again by the Casa Rosada. The radicals would follow the same path Martin LoustauWhich would advance a decision “as if it were a new law,” as it was announced in the afternoon.

Abdalla resumed the discussion in plenary session and said that it was not of a “dictatorial nature” because “there have been talks and suggestions have been heard.” Reflexes were quick, a key to senatorial Kirchnerism, Jose MayansHe told Puntano he was obliged to clarify at the end of the meeting whether the ruling party “has any opinion or not.”

,This process involves you explaining to us the amendments. If not, I don’t understand what we are going to sign, whether the original version that came from the deputies or the draft that circulated among the senators

“, warned the woman from Buenos Aires Guadalupe Tagliaferri (Prof), who was critical in his comments on opening up the game and changing the projects for the ruling party. In fact, he reiterated some criticism of the two-year time limit for entering the Large Investment Incentive Regime (RIGI).

At this point, Abdalá responded: “It is a crucial time to know which ones have signed up and, if successful, this same body will be able to postpone it for the other two. Or we can leave it forever, because we capture money that is not entering Argentina. ” “The writing does not please and it does not satisfy,” Camper said. Anabel Fernandez Sagasti,

Meanwhile, dissident Peronists rejected the possibility of privatizing Aerolineas Argentinas, regarding Juan Carlos Romero He made it clear that a “partial” mechanism would be a better solution, because if it continued like this, “it would continue as a public limited company and, given the sum of the problems, it could go bankrupt and much worse.” And he added: “They are not protecting him.”

The speech of the most important Congolese opponent of the Base Law and the fiscal package – along with Tagliaferri – was awaited, the radical Loustau: Centenary Party Title He said the first initiative’s amendments were “cosmetic in nature” and highlighted the “enormous advantages” that come with RIGI to the detriment of local levels.. Along these lines, he elaborated: “There will be market distortions and the president doesn’t believe in that, but he will create it,

for its part, Juliana Di Tullio (Frente para la Victoria) stressed that, with the project in question, “three out of every 10 Argentines are going to retire” and that “no woman will do it”, who “will be forced to work five more years.”

Another radical critic was the Fuegian pablo blancowho reiterated that he would not go along with the delegation of delegated powers – “From 2000 to today, we have never voted on this,” he specified – as well as on the privatization of airlines, Correo Argentino and the public media. However, he confirmed that he would sign the opinion.

In the end, faced with a complex scenario, Abdalla backed down from closing the debate and signing the opinion and went into recess.